Travel Risk Management and Duty of Care When it comes to duty of care and travel risk management, this is what every travel, human resources and risk manager should know. In this article we will cover duty of care defined, how it relates to travel risk management and the key actions required by companies and managers in order to demonstrate or prove duty of care.
This guidance developed using current legislation and guidance see appendices has been written to provide a clear pathway for agencies to follow in response to adults at risk that are self-neglecting or hoarding.
Adults may make lifestyle choices that are perceived by others to not be in their best interest or unwise; fundamental freedoms exist so that people are able to live their lives without interference unless it is necessary and proportionate to do so.
Inference may be necessary and legitimate in safeguarding where required for safety of individuals or others, or where the person lacks mental capacity for a decision as to what is in their best interest.
Risk Management concerns and advice The flowchart below page 12 will assist operational staff and agencies in making an email request via the adultsafeguarding plymouth.
Requests will be reviewed during office hours, Monday to Friday. Beginning with the assumption that the individual is best placed to judge their wellbeing; The individuals view, wishes, feelings and belief; Preventing or delaying development of needs for care and support and reducing needs that exist; Need to protect people from abuse and neglect; Any restrictions on the individuals rights or freedom or action that is involved in the exercise of the function is kept to a minimum; Importance of individuals participation as fully as possible in decisions about them.
This guidance does not provide in depth background information on self-neglect and hoarding; there is a wealth of information available and links to documents at the end of this policy. Self-neglect differs from other safeguarding concerns as there is no perpetrators of abuse, however abuse cannot be ruled out as a purpose for becoming self-neglecting; part of the Care Act requirements are to address what has caused the self-neglect or hoarding.
Hoarding can be described as collecting and being unable to discard excessive quantities of goods or objects. As behaviour, it is quite common and most people who hoard possessions do not have a psychiatric disorder, however, in some cases the problem may progress to become so severe that it causes significant distress and impairment.
The reasons why someone begins hoarding aren't fully understood. It can be a symptom of another condition. For example, someone with mobility problems may be physically unable to clear the huge amounts of clutter they have acquired.
People with learning disabilities or people developing dementia may be unable to categorise and dispose of items. Mental health problems associated with hoarding include: In some cases, hoarding is a condition in itself and often associated with self-neglect.
Principles There are a number of principles which underpin this guidance: Adults can make lifestyle choices contrary to what is perceived to be common sense.
Attempts to intervene must be proportionate and reasonable; Partnership approach should be used in cases where appropriate to enable powers and abilities of difference organisations to be implemented; Emergency responses will still require immediate contact with fire, police or ambulance service; A multi-agency Risk Management Meeting to discuss concerns, with the involvement of the adult at risk, should be a starting point.
Self neglect and hoarding is a complex area to work with; it requires confidence, persistence and resilience. Moreover the work can prove emotional, challenging, anxiety-provoking and frustrating. It enables practitioners to reflect, to talk through cases and the dilemmas they present, and to explore possible innovative ways to engage and practise.
The support of team and multi-agency colleagues is therefore critical too, for sharing ideas and debriefing.
Mental capacity involves not only weighing up information and being able to understand consequences of decisions and actions, but also the ability to implement those actions. For those who self-neglect and lack mental capacity for the particular decision, the intervention focus will be to reduce risk through a best interest decision.Duty of Care Under the Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA) , it is the duty of every employer and employee to, so far as is reasonably practicable, ensure the health safety and welfare at work of all persons (staff, visitors, themselves) in their care in the workplace.
Risk Assessment Questions.
Questions should be asked in the order given until the person is no longer exhibiting the increasing risk factors.
Risk level is likely to increase for suicide with the more positive and detailed responses to these questions. Risk assessments, sometimes called hazard assessments, systematically go through particular roles or locations and look for things than can go wrong.
This guide is designed to help you with that process. ing duty of reasonable care upon therapist to protect intended victim); see also John Monahan, Limiting Therapist Exposure to TarasoffLiability: Guidelines for Risk Containment, 48 AU& PSYCHOLOGIST () (discussing duty to protect).
Duty of care must be balanced with dignity of risk, that is, the right of informed individuals to take calculated risks. Everyone has a right to an assumption of competence.
Informed decision making involves a general awareness of the consequences of the decision and the decision is made voluntarily and without coercion. / Travel risk assessment secures Duty of Care 01st September Many areas across the business were working on important travel risk mitigation projects – all in isolation.